
AI,
Generative AI,
GenAI,
technology,
digital transformation,
Published on Tue May 19 2026
Updated on Fri May 29 2026
5 minute read
While the world buzzes about the transformative power of artificial intelligence, a closer look reveals diverging paths in its adoption. The US is a research powerhouse, home to the generative AI breakthroughs. However, a different narrative is unfolding elsewhere, particularly in how these advancements are being integrated into the broader economy. Innovation doesn’t follow a single path. How AI evolves - and how we choose to integrate it - will shape industries, communities, and opportunities in unique ways.
Customer experience (CX) design has been at the forefront of this change. Almost every executive managing a CX or customer service process has had to fundamentally rethink how their part of the business operates. AI has become an essential tool in building a bridge between brands and customers. Although the most rapid change has only taken place in the past two years, innovation has taken place in a number of ways:
It is clear that across the entire connection between brands and customers, AI is reshaping the landscape - in customer-facing tools and inside the organization. However, companies are made up of a multitude of vertical and horizontal services that all contribute to the overall function of the business, whatever the industry. It should be possible to apply AI in all these different components of the business in a way that drives both productivity and innovation.
This is where I think that something interesting is happening in the world today. Most of the finance and activity related to AI research appears to be based in the USA. All the well-known language models and consumer-facing AI systems are from companies such as OpenAI, Amazon, Meta, or Google.
The US Department of Defense has dramatically increased their spending on AI systems over 2022 and 2023 - hundreds of new contracts each year have AI in the title. The US government and private sector are investing hundreds of millions of dollars - if not more - into R&D in this area. But look at the US Census Bureau Business Trends Outlook Survey - a sample of . It’s worth quoting the survey where they comment on AI adoption by American companies:

Created at Tue Jun 09 2026
4 min read
Every customer conversation carries more than a case number. Beneath the stated issue sits a layer of urgency, hesitation, and trust that shapes whether a customer stays loyal or simply moves on. And when interactions run into the hundreds or thousands each day, those emotional signals rarely surface through traditional quality monitoring. A support team reviewing only 5% of calls and waiting on post-survey responses is, in effect, managing a relationship it can barely see. That blind spot carri
‘The highest adoption rate was 7.2% for firms with 250 or more employees, while the second-highest adoption rate was 5.5% for firms with one to four employees. Medium-sized firms, ranging from 5 to 249 employees, had lower adoption rates.’
Initially, I suspected that this data must be old. It’s from the Census Bureau, so it was probably from a survey undertaken years ago. However, the last update to the dataset was on May 8, 2025. This is up-to-the-minute data on a large set of American companies. The US is a powerhouse of AI research and innovation, but are American companies changing their business model and innovating because of the tools that are becoming available?
If we contrast this with China then there is a very different picture. Most of us based outside China only really know about DeepSeek when asked about AI in China. That’s the main Chinese AI tool that has really hit the headlines globally. OpenAI has accused DeepSeek of inappropriately copying ChatGPT. These are open accusations that I’m not going to offer my own opinion on here, but the really important point is not whether DeepSeek was original research or not. This is how DeepSeek - and AI more generally - is applied in China.
The Chinese government has taken the view that AI is a critical driver of economic growth and encouraged companies to investigate how they can improve productivity as well as developing new business models with AI. Government agencies and the private sector have all been rushing to develop new ideas using DeepSeek.
‘The government, companies, and investors in China share a common belief that China’s AI opportunity lies more in AI applications - services built on top of AI - rather than solely trying to make models larger to improve performance,’ Tilly Zhang, a technology analyst at Beijing-based research firm Gavekal Dragonomics, told Rest of World. This is a striking difference from the US experience. American companies are focused on developing and improving AI models, but Chinese companies are focusing on the application of AI to their government and corporate services. A SAS Institute survey in 2024 found that 83% of all Chinese companies are already using generative AI.
Although DeepSeek is the best-known Chinese system, there is a broader ecosystem of companies, such as Baidu, Tencent, and Alibaba, that are both investing in AI development and the application of AI to their existing business model. The CEO of Alibaba, Eddie Wu, said in February 2025 that his company plans to “aggressively invest” in the pursuit of AI that is equal to, or more advanced than, human intelligence.
These statistics are difficult to compare. There is no single study that is comparing different nations using the same survey, so it’s easy to point at one study or another when arguing about AI adoption by industry. But it cannot be denied that there is an excitement across Chinese businesses about AI that goes far beyond the technology sector alone - every business appears to be exploring how to redesign their company from the ground up. This is the key point. The US has been leading in AI research for many years, but what happens if American companies just don’t adopt the technology, or are slow to adopt it? Will consumers care?
Sometimes, there is a technological possibility that is delayed because consumers are not interested. Autonomous vehicles is a recent example. If more consumers were more excited about the prospect of driverless taxis, then they would probably already be in every major city. They are rolling out gradually, but are often mired in questions about who is liable when there is an accident.
The American companies undertaking world-leading AI research need to help more general non-tech industries understand the opportunities that AI presents. At present, it feels like productivity and efficiency gains are the main focus in the boardroom. A wide variety of industries could take a lesson from CX leaders to explore ideas such as:
Chinese companies have been encouraged to rapidly adopt AI, but the US still has the leading-edge research that is developing the global future for AI. The tech sector just needs to work harder to ensure there is a more general adoption of AI as a tool that can transform any business

Created at Wed Jun 03 2026
4 min read
Have you ever found yourself hovering over a "cancel subscription" button only to be met with a personalized offer that suddenly makes staying feel like the smarter choice? Or how about a pity-seeking pop-up that only reinforces your desire to get out? In an era where consumers’ choices are limitless and a subscription can be ended with a single tap, the margin for error is razor thin.
The brands that understand this moment and what drives it are the ones building durable subscriber relationshi

Created at Fri May 29 2026
5 min read
When a Medicare Advantage member hangs up the phone in frustration, what does that abandoned call actually cost the plan? The true financial penalty doesn’t just come from wasted handling time on a dashboard. It's the formal grievance filed days later, the plummeting CAHPS score, and the decision to switch plans during the next Annual Enrollment Period. Ironically, these downstream costs stem from a gap between “operational efficiency” and “member experience” generated by the very aggressive cos