
Customer experience,
customer loyalty,
customer retention,
brand reputation,
CX,
Published on Fri Jul 17 2026
Updated on Fri Jul 17 2026
5 minute read
Most commentators with a connection to designing enterprise systems that manage customer experience (CX) spend a lot of time talking about how to improve customer service processes. How can we improve the multichannel experience? How can we apply AI to improve our self-service options? And so on.
But what do all the brands reading all these ideas really want? They want to reduce the cost of doing business. They want to grow their revenue by increasing sales to customers. They want to encourage customer loyalty, retention, and recommendations to other potential customers. All these brands really just want these business outcomes. Loyal customers who help their brand grow.
Yet the discussion around CX focuses endlessly on the process of answering calls or emails. Nobody buys a Ferrari car or an Apple laptop because the customer service team answers their email promptly. What we really need to think of is the customer journey from first awareness of a brand to a first purchase and then an ongoing relationship. Are we making this entire process easy, or does it introduce anxiety or fear along the way?
Some customer journeys do genuinely involve traps. Think about all those satellite and cable TV companies who make it almost impossible to cancel a contract. When you decide you want to stop your subscription you can’t just click a button. You have to call and wait while an agent from revenue protection talks about why you are making the wrong decision.
Compare this approach to streaming companies like Netflix. There is a button to cancel. It takes a second. It’s also easy to re-subscribe. Some users will take a couple of months off and then subscribe again - imagine trying that with a cable service. We need to embrace the way that human brains work. We want autonomy - the ability to make our own decisions and choices. We don’t want to feel that a company only has our money because they have us trapped into buying a service. Why don’t we actively design more services this way?
Researcher Marcus Buckingham talks about this as love - what you can learn from your biggest fans. Companies need to design services so employees and customers love them a little more with each interaction. His book ‘Design Love In’ describes how companies like Disney will entirely redesign theme park rides because the customers are only rating it 4 out of 5. There is a model to describe this area of neuroscience. It’s called SCARF and was developed by Dr David Rock in 2008. The acronym describes the five domains that trigger brain activity similar to our survival instinct - Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Fairness.
Instinctively, we all understand this because it is how all our brains are designed to function:
This seems odd - even counterintuitive because many people hate their experience of Ryanair service. However, the brand offers fairness and certainty. Customers of Ryanair are prepared to accept a lower level of customer service than they would expect on other airlines because the airline is honest about the value they offer.
You get what you pay for and there are no surprises. Loyalty is created through trust in the brand - not a love of their service. When Ryanair CEO, Michael O’Leary started trading personal insults online with Elon Musk because of the cost of the Starlink satellite wi-fi system it just reinforced the reputation of the brand - they don’t hide behind corporate jargon. They tell it as it is.
VW faces challenges today as the auto industry pivots to electric and autonomous vehicles, but the brand has always focused on certainty and fairness. The legacy of vehicles such as the Beetle and the Kombi has created many examples of multi-generational ownership that is hard to identify in other auto brands. It was a global news story when the Kombi was cancelled in 2014.
VW has built a connection with customers that is built on reliability and familiarity. There is a strong sense of fairness and value from the brand that drives repeat purchases over a lifetime.
This is another brand that somehow feels counterintuitive because some shoppers cannot wait to escape from the enormous IKEA stores, but there is a strong argument demonstrating that the SCARF model applies to the Billy bookcase. IKEA products require effort - most require self-assembly - but this creates a reward. The customer builds an emotional investment in their new furniture because they built it themselves.
There is also a strong sense of certainty - you know exactly what you are getting. IKEA somehow turns greater effort into a greater attachment to a product. It’s reminiscent of the classic story of American cake mixtures only succeeding with consumers once a fresh egg was required - a story that is largely a marketing myth, but has more than a grain of psychological truth.
Just over two decades ago, the Lego Group almost went bankrupt. They had increased debt and extended the brand into clothing and electronic toys. It almost finished the brand, until they got back to basics and focused on why parents and children love Lego.
Lego encourages creativity. Children feel a sense of their own autonomy as they don’t have a rulebook - they can build anything that is in their imagination. It uses a structured system that always works and therefore reinforces certainty and generates infinite possibilities for play. By focusing on these emotions, Lego has created a multigenerational loyalty. Parents remember Lego and buy it for their own children.
In all these examples, there is a focus on the emotional stickiness of the brand. Customers feel an emotional connection to these brands. It’s easy to argue that customers are not choosing these brands because of efficient customer service processes, but this diminishes the need for a positive customer experience. Customers can easily be lost to alternatives if they have a negative experience with a company - even one they previously loved.
Whether you are already a brand that is loved - or it is your ambition to achieve this status - it remains important to plan for a positive experience when customers interact with your company. You need to plan for personalization, where the human touch remains essential, and how to align your service with the overall impression customers have of your brand. It can be a challenge to create truly emotionally engaged customers, but once you have them, poor customer service design can quickly lose them.

Created at Fri Jul 17 2026
5 min read
Most commentators with a connection to designing enterprise systems that manage customer experience (CX) spend a lot of time talking about how to improve customer service processes. How can we improve the multichannel experience? How can we apply AI to improve our self-service options? And so on.
But what do all the brands reading all these ideas really want? They want to reduce the cost of doing business. They want to grow their revenue by increasing sales to customers. They want to encourage
We all know how this feels, too. There are some products that we always buy. It doesn’t matter if there are cheaper options available - we want the product that makes us feel good or gives a sense of certainty and continuity. Thinking about this concept can create some useful insight that goes far beyond the usual discussions of customer experience. Think about some of the brands where the SCARF model works and connects with how customers feel.

Created at Fri Jul 10 2026
5 min read
Picture a retailer coming off its best-ever Black Friday traffic numbers. The campaigns worked. Acquisition spend delivered. Demand surged beyond even the most optimistic projections. And yet, two weeks later, the margin report tells another story: teams struggled with skyrocketing requests, support queues ran days behind, and costs ballooned enough to erase hard-won gains. Surprising? It shouldn’t be. Assuming that if demand is strong, the numbers will follow is something most brands are guilty

Created at Mon Jun 29 2026
4 min read
Walk into almost any customer experience leadership meeting and the conversation quickly lands on the same conclusion: hire better people. Teams respond by tightening recruitment filters, raising assessment bars, or increasing language benchmarks. Hiring matters, but these measures assume that successful performance is intrinsic to a candidate and only needs to be discovered. The result? Prolonged ramp times and budgets burnt through early attrition - all while organizations ignore the actual in