
CX,
AI,
Automation,
people management,
Published on Wed Apr 29 2026
Updated on Wed Apr 29 2026
4 minute read
We make unconscious choices several times every single day. Most people rarely stop to think about them because they are unconscious - it requires focused effort to stop and think precisely about what you are doing. Driving is a good example. When you first learn to drive a car, you need to think about each action, but it eventually becomes natural and fluid.
Earlier this week, I was thinking about this in the context of customer service teams. It’s one of those subjects that works well at the end of the year because most of us have a little more time to step back and look at how things are working - or not.
The story of the past three years in customer experience design has been artificial intelligence. No other subject comes close. The book I published earlier in 2025 featured AI in almost every chapter. The message in 2023 was that large customer service departments can be almost entirely replaced with AI. But as one company after another struggled to scale pilots up to the enterprise, it soon became clear that AI is powerful, but it needs time, expertise, and effort. This isn’t an out-of-the-box solution for anyone.
Customer service teams are still large. In many cases, this is true even where they have adopted new technologies and automated sections of the customer journey. Operational efficiency does not look the way the technology suppliers promised.
Companies that have adopted AI in their CX processes have not closed all their contact centers. In many cases, customer engagement volume has increased. More complex questions, more channels, and more proactive engagement from brands have pushed the number of customer interactions up. None of this is what the AI companies were telling us in 2023. The transformation was going to be almost immediate - and simple.
Our unconscious choices around CX could be the main blocker. Executives are rapidly deploying AI with the hope that efficiency will be improved, yet the problems are almost certainly elsewhere in the business, or in the process of how the company operates. Think about customer call volume. Instead of buying more and more technology to try automating customer interactions, we should really be asking why all these customers need to contact us in the first place.
Taking this approach will naturally shift the focus away from the customer service team. If the customer problems have a theme or recurring pattern then that is where you need to focus. There may be unresolved issues around quality or late deliveries that need to be addressed. You are not staffing to meet customer demand, you should be able to eliminate the demand itself.
Anyone with a background in consulting will recognize this approach as root-cause analysis. By taking a systematic approach to how a business is operating, you can determine where problems or mistakes are being introduced.
Let’s go further with this CX example. Why are your customers calling so often? By exploring the underlying reasons for the calls, we can trigger changes that should reduce the number of times customers need to contact.
Some ideas for where to explore might include:
Framed like this, these ideas don’t seem like rocket science. There is no hidden wisdom. This is basic common sense, but it is illustrative of what has been understood for decades in manufacturing. A small problem early in the supply chain will cause a much bigger problem later on.
Car recalls are a very clear example of my point. In 2024, there were almost 28 million vehicles recalled by their manufacturer in the USA alone. Imagine the efficiency that could be generated if you identified more problems before the cars were delivered to customers. This is our problem when designing customer service processes. We often design how best to deliver a great customer experience rather than believing that the best customer experience is when the customer does not need to call a brand for help.
As we go into 2026, it is worth repeating this message about unconscious choices. Stop and think about what is driving your actions. Are there changes that can be applied inside your business that would quickly reduce the need for customers to seek help? If so, address these issues before running any more technology pilots. Fix the underlying problem, not the symptom.

Created at Fri Jul 17 2026
5 min read
Most commentators with a connection to designing enterprise systems that manage customer experience (CX) spend a lot of time talking about how to improve customer service processes. How can we improve the multichannel experience? How can we apply AI to improve our self-service options? And so on.
But what do all the brands reading all these ideas really want? They want to reduce the cost of doing business. They want to grow their revenue by increasing sales to customers. They want to encourage

Created at Fri Jul 10 2026
5 min read
Picture a retailer coming off its best-ever Black Friday traffic numbers. The campaigns worked. Acquisition spend delivered. Demand surged beyond even the most optimistic projections. And yet, two weeks later, the margin report tells another story: teams struggled with skyrocketing requests, support queues ran days behind, and costs ballooned enough to erase hard-won gains. Surprising? It shouldn’t be. Assuming that if demand is strong, the numbers will follow is something most brands are guilty

Created at Mon Jun 29 2026
4 min read
Walk into almost any customer experience leadership meeting and the conversation quickly lands on the same conclusion: hire better people. Teams respond by tightening recruitment filters, raising assessment bars, or increasing language benchmarks. Hiring matters, but these measures assume that successful performance is intrinsic to a candidate and only needs to be discovered. The result? Prolonged ramp times and budgets burnt through early attrition - all while organizations ignore the actual in